<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of&#160;Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://particletree.com/notebook/the-future-of-television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://particletree.com/notebook/the-future-of-television/</link>
	<description>Everyone needs a hug.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:43:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jenny Young</title>
		<link>http://particletree.com/notebook/the-future-of-television/comment-page-1/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=166#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone needs a hug.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone needs a hug.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://particletree.com/notebook/the-future-of-television/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=166#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yay for pay-per-show setups!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t want to pay for 600 channels of content. I don&#039;t want to pay for 1 channel of content. I want to pay for the content &lt;strong&gt;direct&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The idea of free pilots and $2 a show is great -- but it&#039;s still not enough to move away from ads. Ads make big, big bucks. Admittedly, an internet download delivery system would save money for the providers, but I don&#039;t see this happening without DRM.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I applaud Apple for pushing this marker (downloadable shows) and even bought a show or two just to support the cause (the quality, quite honestly, is terrible). At least it&#039;s moving in the right direction. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay for pay-per-show setups!</p>

<p>I don&#8217;t want to pay for 600 channels of content. I don&#8217;t want to pay for 1 channel of content. I want to pay for the content <strong>direct</strong>.</p>

<p>The idea of free pilots and $2 a show is great &#8212; but it&#8217;s still not enough to move away from ads. Ads make big, big bucks. Admittedly, an internet download delivery system would save money for the providers, but I don&#8217;t see this happening without DRM.</p>

<p>I applaud Apple for pushing this marker (downloadable shows) and even bought a show or two just to support the cause (the quality, quite honestly, is terrible). At least it&#8217;s moving in the right direction. :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Young</title>
		<link>http://particletree.com/notebook/the-future-of-television/comment-page-1/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=166#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@the Author: Great article. It would be brilliant to be able to select the channels you really want, especially as there are people (like me) who don&#039;t watch a great deal of television on the whole, but enjoy specific shows or would like to subscribe to just one sport channel (Sky Sports 1, for example). They&#039;d definitely get more custom, as I for one wouldn&#039;t subscribe to a big package deal, but would definitely go for an, as you put it, A La Carte option.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;@Mike Purvis: Excellent idea about free pilots, and not one I&#039;ve heard suggested before. What a brilliant way to get new shows exposure, and to get a broader sample of public reaction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@the Author: Great article. It would be brilliant to be able to select the channels you really want, especially as there are people (like me) who don&#8217;t watch a great deal of television on the whole, but enjoy specific shows or would like to subscribe to just one sport channel (Sky Sports 1, for example). They&#8217;d definitely get more custom, as I for one wouldn&#8217;t subscribe to a big package deal, but would definitely go for an, as you put it, A La Carte option.</p>

<p>@Mike Purvis: Excellent idea about free pilots, and not one I&#8217;ve heard suggested before. What a brilliant way to get new shows exposure, and to get a broader sample of public reaction.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Purvis</title>
		<link>http://particletree.com/notebook/the-future-of-television/comment-page-1/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Purvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=166#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve said before that pilots should be available for free. Apple.com/trailers has become as ubiquitous as IMDB in the online movie-loving community.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Imagine the power of a similar distribution for TV pilots... go there, watch the 40 minute show, click to order the DVDs on Amazon. (or better yet, pay $2 on iTunes to grab the next episode and keep viewing)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;d be an amazing tool for evangelizing little-known or misunderstood shows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And once everything&#039;s completely on-demand, we&#039;ll see a surge in programming like Alias and Veronica Mars, where a significant element each episode is the continuous story that builds through the season. A lot of Anime is like this too, but North American viewers are apparently too married to the Friends sitcom model where every episode completely stands alone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said before that pilots should be available for free. Apple.com/trailers has become as ubiquitous as IMDB in the online movie-loving community.</p>

<p>Imagine the power of a similar distribution for TV pilots&#8230; go there, watch the 40 minute show, click to order the DVDs on Amazon. (or better yet, pay $2 on iTunes to grab the next episode and keep viewing)</p>

<p>It&#8217;d be an amazing tool for evangelizing little-known or misunderstood shows.</p>

<p>And once everything&#8217;s completely on-demand, we&#8217;ll see a surge in programming like Alias and Veronica Mars, where a significant element each episode is the continuous story that builds through the season. A lot of Anime is like this too, but North American viewers are apparently too married to the Friends sitcom model where every episode completely stands alone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Lawson</title>
		<link>http://particletree.com/notebook/the-future-of-television/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Lawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 21:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=166#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m glad that the FCC is thinking in the right direction, but I&#039;d like to see them thinking a little &lt;strong&gt;further&lt;/strong&gt; in that direction...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Once TiVo came out, a couple fellow TiVo owners and I were discussing the future of television and the cost of getting the cable channels we wanted for a couple of shows.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We had the idea of moving to a business model where you can subscribe to &lt;em&gt;specific shows&lt;/em&gt; rather than channels.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At $0.99/episode (picked arbitrarily, but based on iTunes model), my fiancee would pay about $3.96/month while I would pay closer to $31.68/month for my viewing habits.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe have pilot episodes available for free or for a lesser charge.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway... that was my $0.02.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that the FCC is thinking in the right direction, but I&#8217;d like to see them thinking a little <strong>further</strong> in that direction&#8230;</p>

<p>Once TiVo came out, a couple fellow TiVo owners and I were discussing the future of television and the cost of getting the cable channels we wanted for a couple of shows.</p>

<p>We had the idea of moving to a business model where you can subscribe to <em>specific shows</em> rather than channels.</p>

<p>At $0.99/episode (picked arbitrarily, but based on iTunes model), my fiancee would pay about $3.96/month while I would pay closer to $31.68/month for my viewing habits.</p>

<p>Maybe have pilot episodes available for free or for a lesser charge.</p>

<p>Anyway&#8230; that was my $0.02.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
