Comments on: More Love For JSON http://particletree.com/notebook/more-love-for-json/ Everyone needs a hug. Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:43:07 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Dan http://particletree.com/notebook/more-love-for-json/comment-page-1/#comment-6502 Dan Sat, 23 Dec 2006 16:42:32 +0000 http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=183#comment-6502 <p>Everyone needs a hug.</p> Everyone needs a hug.

]]> By: Maikel http://particletree.com/notebook/more-love-for-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1935 Maikel Fri, 12 May 2006 17:58:05 +0000 http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=183#comment-1935 <p>Hello, Very good article. Javascript powered by JSON and AJAX is the solution to many problems with dynamic programming.</p> <p>Thank you</p> Hello, Very good article. Javascript powered by JSON and AJAX is the solution to many problems with dynamic programming.

Thank you

]]> By: Guest http://particletree.com/notebook/more-love-for-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1934 Guest Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:39:38 +0000 http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=183#comment-1934 <p>> a new name for "AJAX” that drops the ‘X' in > favor of something more appropriate to JSON</p> <p>I sure hope it isn't "AJAJ" cuz JAJ in Corean means penis...</p> > a new name for “AJAX” that drops the ‘X’ in > favor of something more appropriate to JSON

I sure hope it isn’t “AJAJ” cuz JAJ in Corean means penis…

]]> By: P.J. Onori http://particletree.com/notebook/more-love-for-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1933 P.J. Onori Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:40:33 +0000 http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=183#comment-1933 <p>It was definitely a great article by Dustin. For myself, Javascript seems so much more attractive an option with JSON.</p> It was definitely a great article by Dustin. For myself, Javascript seems so much more attractive an option with JSON.

]]> By: real http://particletree.com/notebook/more-love-for-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1932 real Mon, 20 Feb 2006 04:01:59 +0000 http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=183#comment-1932 <p>Dude, this'll be awesome</p> Dude, this’ll be awesome

]]> By: Dustin Diaz http://particletree.com/notebook/more-love-for-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1931 Dustin Diaz Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:36:55 +0000 http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=183#comment-1931 <p>@Ryan: Choo choo... Welcome aboard. I've actually been meaning to write about this for a while, so I'm glad you're on the train with me. I hope others will see its usefulness in due time.</p> <p>@Michael: I could see something more like AJASON. I'll talk to the guys and see what we're coming up with.</p> @Ryan: Choo choo… Welcome aboard. I’ve actually been meaning to write about this for a while, so I’m glad you’re on the train with me. I hope others will see its usefulness in due time.

@Michael: I could see something more like AJASON. I’ll talk to the guys and see what we’re coming up with.

]]> By: Michal Migurski http://particletree.com/notebook/more-love-for-json/comment-page-1/#comment-1930 Michal Migurski Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:47:18 +0000 http://s2462.gridserver.com/wordpress/?p=183#comment-1930 <p>It's great to read this. Interestingly, there's currently a debate in the JSON Y! group about a new name for "AJAX" that drops the 'X' in favor of something more appropriate to JSON. My personal feeling is that this branding exercise is unnecessary - JSON is so self-evidently optimal for this stuff that it doesn't need to be sold to anybody.</p> It’s great to read this. Interestingly, there’s currently a debate in the JSON Y! group about a new name for “AJAX” that drops the ‘X’ in favor of something more appropriate to JSON. My personal feeling is that this branding exercise is unnecessary - JSON is so self-evidently optimal for this stuff that it doesn’t need to be sold to anybody.

]]>